What Kind Of Jerk Would Publish A Faux Newspaper With Disrespectful Lampooning Of Local News Stories?

FREEPORT – An anonymous newsletter that attacks and offends some residents has prompted the Town Council to consider the legal ramifications of removing or banning anonymous printed materials from municipal buildings. The council issued a statement last month condemning the newsletter, A Crow’s Nest, after receiving various legal opinions that the publication is protected free speech. The council is scheduled to discuss what more it can do, if anything, when it meets at 6:30 tonight. “The council feels that it is necessary and appropriate to state, in no uncertain terms, that the town of Freeport does not condone or support the views and opinions explicitly stated or depicted in this publication,” the council said in its written statement Dec. 20. “It is also within the Town Council’s purview to express the strong belief that expressions of this nature are inappropriate, hateful and harmful to the process of civil public discourse,” the council said. “The council urges the author(s) to exercise their First Amendment rights in a manner that is respectful of individuals and which does not imply violence inspired by hatred or slanderous accusations.” A Crow’s Nest is an occasional, self-described news parody, without an identified source or author, that has lampooned town officials and others for more than 25 years. (read more at PortlandPressHerald)

Short URL: http://rumfordmeteor.com/?p=5352

Posted by on Jan 17 2012. Filed under featured, Polly Ticks. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 Comments for “What Kind Of Jerk Would Publish A Faux Newspaper With Disrespectful Lampooning Of Local News Stories?”

  1. I nominate you! You are the best jerk to do this. It is your calling.

  2. aubuchon

    Thank you. The Rumford Meteor does allow voting, but please — no wagering.

  3. Blick

    If A Crow’s Nest has been published for 25 years, why is city council just getting around to banning it? Either city council is slow or there is some article that finally hit a raw nerve. Should be a good scandal under that nerve.

  4. John Kidle


Comments are closed

Photo Gallery

Log in | Designed by Gabfire themes| Send all Inquiries to: Aubuchon@RumfordMeteor.com